|
|
Rhetorical Hermeneutics: Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science (Suny Series in Speech Communication)
|
|
|
|
ÀúÀÚ |
: |
Allan G. Gross (Editor), William M. Keith (Editor), Alan G. Gross (Editor)
|
|
ÃâÆÇ»ç |
: |
State Univ of New York Pr |
ÃâÆdz⵵ |
: |
1996.11.21 |
ÆäÀÌÁö¼ö |
: |
380
( 񀬔 : 1 )
|
I S B N |
: |
079143110X |
Á¤°¡ |
: |
21.00£¤
|
ÆǸŰ¡ |
: |
42,280¿ø
back ... |
|
¡Ø [¾Ë¸²] ¿Ü±¹µµ¼ (¿µ¹®,ÀϹ®) ÁÖ¹®½Ã ¹Ì¸® È®ÀÎÇϼ¼¿ä.
ÇöÀç ƯÇã¼Á¡¿¡¼ ÆǸŵǰí ÀÖ´Â ¿µ¹® ¹× ÀϾ¼´Â ÇØ¿ÜÁÖ¹®À» ÅëÇÑ ¹è¼ÛÀ» ÇÏ´Â °ü°è·Î ´Ù¼Ò ºÒÆíÇϽôõ¶óµµ ÇØ´ç µµ¼ÀÇ ÁÖ¹® °¡´É ¿©ºÎ¸¦ ¸ÕÀú È®ÀÎÇϽðí ÁÖ¹®ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.
(02)501-3106(³»¼± 100)À¸·Î ¿¬¶ôÁֽðųª ¿ÞÂʸ޴ºÀÇ Help Desk¿¡ ¹®ÀÇ»çÇ× ¹× ¿¬¶ôó¸¦ ³²°ÜÁÖ½Ã¸é ´ã´çÀÚ°¡ ÁÖ¹®°¡´É ¿©ºÎ¸¦ ¹Ù·Î È®ÀÎÇص帱¼ö°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
Ư¡ |
Contributors respond to an essay by Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar, who asks whether rhetorical theory can function as a general hermeneutic, whether it has legitimate theoretical status, and whether an intentional, strategic theory of rhetoric can survive the poststructuralist, postmodernist critique. They offer a humanist's response and critical reflection on the rhetorical criticism of science, and discuss issues such as engineering rhetoric and rhetoric as a design art. Includes a reply by Gaonkar. Annotation c. by Book News, Inc., Portland, Or. --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
|
|