|
|
ÇØ¿Ü Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç¡¤Æ¯Çã º¸È£¥¶ (Çʸ®ÇÉ Æí)
|
|
|
|
ÀúÀÚ |
: |
Çѱ¹Æ¯Çã±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø
|
|
ÃâÆÇ»ç |
: |
ÁøÇÑ¿¥¾Øºñ |
ÃâÆdz⵵ |
: |
2010.04.13 |
ÆäÀÌÁö¼ö |
: |
360
( 񀬔 : 1 )
|
I S B N |
: |
8984324434 |
Á¤°¡ |
: |
150,000¿ø
|
ÆǸŰ¡ |
: |
135,000¿ø
back ... |
|
Ư¡ |
Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ±â¼úÇõ½ÅÀ» ÅëÇÑ ¿¬±¸°³¹ß°ú Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç È®º¸°¡ ±¹°¡ °æÀï·Â °ÈÀÇ ¿øõÀÌ µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
WTO/TRIPSÇùÁ¤¿¡¼µµ Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç º¸È£°¡ °ÈµÇ¾î ¼¼°è °÷°÷¿¡¼ Áö½ÄÀç»ê±ÇÀ» ¹«±â·ÎÇÑ ¼±Áø±¹ ±â¾÷µéÀÇ ¹«Â÷º° °ø¼¼´Â ´õ¿í ½É鵃 Àü¸ÁÀÌ´Ù.
ƯÈ÷ µ¿³²¾Æ½Ã¾ÆÀÇ ¼ºÀå ÀáÀç·ÂÀÌ Ç³ºÎÇÑ Çʸ®ÇÉÀº dzºÎÇÑ ³ëµ¿·ÂÀ» ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ¸Å³â ²ÙÁØÇÑ °æÁ¦ ¼ºÀå·üÀ» ÀÚ¶ûÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÀÏÂïÀÌ °³¹æÈµÈ Áö½ÄÀç»ê±ÇÁ¦µµ·Î Áö½ÄÀç»ê±ÇÀ» º¸È£ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ±¹³»±â ¾÷µéÀÌ Çʸ®ÇÉ ½ÃÀå¿¡ ÁøÃâÇÏ¿© ÁÖµµÀûÀÎ À§Ä¡¸¦ Á¡Çϱâ À§Çؼ´Â Çʸ®ÇÉ Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç¹ý°ú Á¦µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀÌÇظ¦ ³ÐÈ÷°í È°¿ë´É·ÂÀ» °ÈÇÔÀ¸·Î½á Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç¹ý Á¦µµ¸¦ ÀûÀýÈ÷ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
±â¾÷µéÀº ¸ÕÀú ½ÃÀåÁøÃâ¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ Æ¯Çã ․ »ê¾÷µðÀÚÀÎ ․ »óÇ¥ µî Áö½ÄÀç»ê±ÇÀ» È®º¸ÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ°í, ÇÊ¿ä½Ã ÀÌµé ±Ç¸®¸¦ Çà»çÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ½ÃÀå¿¡¼ÀÇ µ¶Á¡Àû ÁöÀ§¸¦ ¼±Á¡ÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
¶ÇÇÑ ºó¹ßÇÏ´Â °¢Á¾ Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç ºÐÀï¿¡ È¿°úÀûÀ¸·Î ´ëÀÀÇϱâ À§Çؼµµ Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç¹ý°ú Á¦µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀÌÇØ ¹× È°¿ë´É·ÂÀ» °ÈÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. |
ÁÖ¿ä¸ñÂ÷ |
Á¦ 1 Àå ¼·Ð
Á¦ 1 Àý °³°ü
Á¦ 2 Àý Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç ´ã´ç±â°ü
Á¦ 3 Àý Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç °ü·Ã ¹ý·ü
1. Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç ÀÔ¹ý»ç
2. ÇöÇà¹ý·ü
Á¦ 2 Àå Áö½ÄÀç»ê±ÇÀÇ Ãâ¿ø ¹× °ü¸®
Á¦ 1 Àý °³°ü
Á¦ 2 Àý ƯÇãÀÇ Ãâ¿ø ¹× °ü¸®
1. Ãâ¿ø
2. ½É»ç
3. µî·Ï
4. ƯÇã±ÇÀÇ È¿·Â
5. ½Ç½Ã±Ç
Á¦ 3 Àý µðÀÚÀÎÀÇ Ãâ¿ø ¹× °ü¸®
1. Ãâ¿ø
2. ½É»ç
3. µî·Ï
4. µðÀÚÀαÇÀÇ È¿·Â
5. ½Ç½Ã±Ç
Á¦ 4 Àý »óÇ¥ÀÇ Ãâ¿ø ¹× °ü¸®
1. Ãâ¿ø
2. ½É»ç
3. µî·Ï
4. »óÇ¥±ÇÀÇ È¿·Â
5. ½Ç½Ã±Ç
Á¦ 3 Àå Áö½ÄÀç»ê±ÇÀÇ º¸È£
Á¦ 1 Àý °³°ü
Á¦ 2 Àý ½ÉÆÇ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ º¸È£
1. ´ã´ç±â°ü
2. ½ÉÆÇÀÇ Á¾·ù
3. û±¸ ¼·ù ¹× ÀýÂ÷
4. ±â Ÿ
Á¦ 3 Àý ¼Ò¼Û¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ º¸È£
1. ħÇØ·Î º¸´Â ÇàÀ§
2. ¼ÕÇØ¾× »êÁ¤
3. ¹Î»çÀû ±¸Á¦
4. Çü»çÀû ±¸Á¦
5. ÇàÁ¤Àû ±¸Á¦
Á¦ 4 Àý ºÎÁ¤°æÀï ¹æÁö¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ º¸È£
1. º¸È£´ë»ó
2. ħÇؽà ±¸Á¦¹æ¾È
[ºÎ·Ï 1] Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç °ü·Ã ºÐÀï »ç·Ê ¹× ÁÖ¿ä ÆÇ·Ê
Á¦ 1 Àý ƯÇã ․ µðÀÚÀÎ
1. ºÐÀï»ç·Ê
(1) Smith Kline & French Laboratories, Ltd. vs. Court of Appeals
(2) Adrian de la Paz vs. Director of Patents and Petrophil Corporation
(3) Domiciano Aguas vs. Conrado de Leon, Court of Appeals
(4) James Howard Boothe and John Morton, ¥± vs. The Director of Patents
(5) Boehringer Ingelheim Gmbh et al., vs. United Laboratories, et al.
(6) Jessie G. Ching vs. William M. Salinas, Sr
(7) Creser Precision Systems, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals and Floro International Corp.
(8) Manufacturing Corporation Angelita Manzano vs. Court of Appeals
(9) Roberto L. Del Rosario vs. Court of Appeals and Janito Corporation
(10) Rosario C. Maguan (formerly Rosario C. Tan) vs. The Hon. Court of Appeals and Susana Luchan
(11) Kenneth Roy Savage vs. Mendco Development
2. ÁÖ¿ä ÆÇ·Ê
(1) ½Ã¸ÞƼµò »ç°Ç
(2) ENVIRO-SOLID SEPTIK TANK °Ç
(3) ¡®ÄÚÄÚ³Ó ³ª¹«¸¦ ¿À¸£´Â ÀåÄ¡¡¯°Ç
Á¦ 3 Àý »óÇ¥
1. ºÐÀï »ç·Ê
(1)LEVI STRAUSS (PHILS.), INC. vs. VOGUE TRADERS CLOTHING COMPANY
(2) McDonalds corporation and Mc George Food Industries, Inc. vs. L.C.Big Mak Burger, Inc.,
(3) Mighty Corporation and La Campana Fabrica de Tabaco, Inc. vs. E & J Gallo Winery and the Andersons Group, Inc.
(4) 246 Corporation vs. Hon. Reynaldo B. Daway
(5) Pearl & Dean (Phil.), Incorporated vs. Shoemart, Incorporated, and North Edsa Marketing, Incorporated
(6) Vanancio Sambar, doing business under the name and style of CVS Garment Enterprise vs. Levi Strauss & Co. and Levi Strauss (Phil), Inc.
(7) Amigo Manufacturing, Inc. vs. Cluett Peabody Co., Inc.
(8) Societe Des Produits Nestle, S.A. and Nestle Philippines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals and CFC Corporation
(9) Shangri-La International Hotel Management Ltd., Shangri-La Properties,Inc., Makati Shangri-La Hotel and Resort,Inc. and Kuok Philippine Properties, Inc. vs. The Court of Appeals, Hon. Felix M. De Guzman and Developers Groups of Companies, Inc.
(10) Canon Kabushiki Kaisha vs. Court of Appeals and NSR Rubber Corporation
(11) Celine »óÇ¥ µî·Ï ÀÌÀÇ ½Åû
2. ÁÖ¿ä ÆÇ·Ê
(1) Philip Morris, Inc., Benson & Hedges(Canada), INC., vs. Fabriques de tabac Reunies, S.A.
(2) MCDONALD'S CORPORATION vs. L.C. BIG MAK BURGER, INC.
(3) ¸ðÁ¶ ¿ÀŬ·¹ÀÌ ¾È°æ Á¦Ç° °Ç
(4) ¼Ò´ÏÄÄÇ»ÅÍ Playstation °Ç
(5) DIAMOND »óÇ¥ ·Î°í °Ç
(6) Gallo »óÇ¥ ħÇØ °Ç
Á¦ 4 Àý ºÎÁ¤°æÀï¹æÁö
1. ºÐÀï»ç·Ê
(1) La Chemise Lacoste, S.A vs. Hon. Oscar C. Fernandez & Gobindram Hemandas
(2) Universal Rubber Products, Inc. vs. Hon. Of Court of Appeals
(3) Wolverine Worldwide, Inc. vs. Hon. Court of Appreals and Lolita P.Cruz
(4) Del Monte Corporation °ú Philippine Packaging Corporation vs. Court of Appeals
(5) Leonor A. Olalia & Jesus G. Olalia vs. Lolita O. Hizon
(6) Philip S. Yu vs. Court of Appeals
(7) Asia Brewery, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
(8) Pro Line Sports Center, Inc. & Questor Corporation vs. Court of Appeals
(9) LOUIS VUITTON S.A. vs. ÆÇ»ç FRANCICSO DIAZ VILLANUEVA
(10) Manolo P. Samson vs. Antipolo ½Ã Áö¹æ¹ý¿ø
[ºÎ·Ï 2] Áö½ÄÀç»ê±Ç¹ý Republic Act 8293 ¹ø¿ª¹® |
|